Comparison of Reactive Blue 203 Dye Removal Using Ultraviolet Irradiation, Ferrate (VI) Oxidation Process and MgO Nanoparticles

Amirreza Talaiekhozani ^1,2 * , Nilofar Torkan ³, Fahad Banisharif ^4,5, Zeinab Eskandari ³, Shahabaldin Rezania ⁶, Junboum Park ⁶, Farham Aminsharei ^7,8, Ali Mohammad Amani ^2,9

Cited by CrossRef: 4

1- Seid-Mohammadi A, Bahrami M, Omari S, Asadi F. Removalof Cephalexin From Aqueous Solutions Using Magnesium Oxide/Granular Activated Carbon Hybrid Photocatalytic Process. Avicenna J Environ Health Eng. 2019;6(1):24 [Crossref]

2- Coltre D, Cionek C, Meneguin J, Maeda C, Braga M, de Araújo A, Gauze G, de Barros M, Arroyo P. Study of dye desorption mechanism of bone char utilizing different regenerating agents. SN Appl Sci. 2020;2(12) [Crossref]

3- Pirsaheb M, Moradi N. A systematic review of the sonophotocatalytic process for the decolorization of dyes in aqueous solution: Synergistic mechanisms, degradation pathways, and process optimization. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021;44:102314 [Crossref]

4- Gunawan G, Prasetya N, Haris A, Pratista E. Ferrate synthesis using NaOCl and its application for dye removal. 2022;20(1):1142 [Crossref]

5- Orsoletta G, de Lara Moreira Mandelli M, da Rocha R, Dekker R, Cunha M. Potential of peanut shells as a biosorbent of Reactive Blue 203 dye in industrial effuentnt. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2024; [Crossref]