Logo-ajehe
Submitted: 22 Feb 2023
Accepted: 07 Nov 2023
First published online: 29 Dec 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 2173
PDF Download: 442
Full Text View: 13
Avicenna J Environ Health Eng. 10(2):120-123. doi: 10.34172/ajehe.5347

Policy Brief

Control of Filamentous Bacteria overgrowth by Changing the Hydraulic Flow Distribution of a Step-feed Biological Nitrogen Removal (SFBNR) Process-based WWTP: A Full-scale Study

Majid Ghanbari Pak 1 ORCID logo, Reza Shokoohi 2, Kazem Godini 3, Ghasem Azarian 2, * ORCID logo

Author information:
1Hamedan Wastewater Treatment Plant Process Expert, Hamadan, Iran
2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

*Corresponding author: Ghasem Azarian, Email: g.azarian@umsha.ac.ir

Abstract

To facilitate the wastewater recycling process while adhering to environmental and industrial regulations, it becomes imperative to meet stringent standards. This necessitates the effective elimination of organic substances, with particular emphasis on nitrogen-based compounds. To this end, activated sludge methods, particularly the step-feed biological nitrogen removal (SFBNR) process, are employed. Although various operational measures are employed in SFBNR systems, including the elimination of complex substrates, modifications in aeration conditions, the utilization of piston hydraulic flow, and the appropriate distribution of substrates, these systems remain susceptible to the excessive growth of filamentous bacteria. The current study aimed to examine the change in the distribution of the hydraulic flow entering this system on a real scale over a period of five years. It was observed that the quality of sludge settling improved and accordingly the overgrowth of filamentous Microthrix parvicella declined, thereby enhancing the quality of the effluent.

Keywords: Wastewater recycling, Microthrix parvicella, Hydraulic flow control, Ammonia, Nitrate, SVI,

Copyright and License Information

© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Please cite this article as follows: Ghanbari Pak M, Shokoohi R, Godini K, Azarian G. Control of filamentous bacteria by changing the hydraulic flow distribution of a step-feed biological nitrogen removal (SFBNR) process-based WWTP: a full-scale study. Avicenna J Environ Health Eng. 2023; 10(2):120-123. doi:10.34172/ajehe.5347


1. Introduction

The need to treat and reuse wastewater generated by urban and industrial areas for industrial and agricultural purposes has become urgent due to environmental crises resulting from wastewater discharge and the depletion of freshwater resources (1). The use of biological processes is highly prevalent in wastewater treatment and recycling, with activated sludge processes being particularly popular (2,3). These processes involve the utilization of microorganisms to effectively treat wastewater and facilitate its reuse. To reuse treated wastewater, the levels of total suspended solids (TSS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate, ammonia, and various other parameters should fall within specified ranges set by standards. These parameters serve as indicators of the water quality and must meet the required criteria for safe and acceptable reuse (4). Step-feed biological nitrogen removal (SFBNR) is a wastewater treatment process that is specifically designed to remove nitrogen compounds, such as ammonia and nitrate, from wastewater (5).


2. Problem Description

Considering the widespread use of the SFBNR process in wastewater treatment plants of Iran, such as Hamadan Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), the objective is to ensure that the discharged effluent contains contents of ammonia, nitrate, TSS, BOD, and COD that are below specific threshold values of 1, 10, 10, 30, and 60 mg/L, respectively. Besides, the turbidity of the effluent must be less than 10 NTU. In many cases, the discharge of industrial wastewaters to municipal sewage networks is associated with the presence of organic compounds in the treatment plant, thereby impairing the quality of the effluent, including increased content of ammonia. As a result, the excessive growth of filamentous bacteria, especially Microthrix parvicella, may happen, which is one of the most common operating problems of treatment plants designed to remove nitrogen. It should be pointed out that this excessive growth leads to sludge bulking as well as the formation of foam in bioreactors in many urban sewage treatment plants (6-8). The occurrence of fatty acids in the wastewater and a drop in wastewater temperature to below 15 °C result in the proliferation and dominance of filamentous M. parvicella in the sludge of the wastewater treatment plants (9,10). Consequently, this phenomenon is attributed to an elevation in the SVI index and a deterioration in the settling quality of the sludge (11). It is worth noting that in the current study, the performance of the WWTP was evaluated by routine measurements of COD, BOD, dissolved oxygen (DO), mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS), NH4-N, NO3-N, and sludge volume index (SVI) as well as microscopic examination of sludge during the investigation period. Additionally, all tests were conducted according to the procedures explained in the standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Microscopic analysis of the sludge samples was conducted following the method developed by Eikelboom. The prevalence of filamentous microorganisms was determined using the filamentous index (FI), graded on a scale from 0 to 5, as established by Eikelboom. Additionally, a sulfur storage test was conducted to observe and assess the presence of sulfur-storing filaments. However, parameters such as ammonia and nitrate levels, MLSS, and return activated sludge mixed liquor suspended solids (RMLSS), as well as indices like SVI and solids retention time (SRT), were monitored daily through composite sampling. Moreover, BOD, COD, DO, and temperature were determined twice a week. Meanwhile, microscopic analyses of the sludge, including the identification of dominant and secondary filamentous microorganisms, assessment of the FI, and quantification of filamentous M. parvicella, were conducted twice per month (12).


3. Public Policy Options

Various solutions have been proposed to reduce and control the growth of filamentous bacteria. Implementing a pre-treatment unit designed to remove substrates like lipids, changing the hydraulic flow pattern to a piston mode, adjusting aeration conditions, and ensuring even substrate distribution are among the proposed measures (13-15).


4. Conclusion

In this study, the decline of the excessive growth of filamentous M. parvicella and the removal efficiency of nitrogen compounds on the real scale in Hamadan WWTP were investigated by changing the hydraulic flow distribution (Fig. 1). According to Fig. 1, the WWTP has been designed and built in accordance with mode A to remove simultaneously organic, nitrogen, and phosphorus compounds. However, the flow configuration was changed to mode B in 2017, mode C in 2018, and ultimately to mode D starting in 2019 to assess the mode that exhibited the most optimal performance. The observations indicated that mode D yielded the most favorable outcomes, as it led to a reduction in the overgrowth of filamentous M. parvicella, foam formation, and an increase in the removal of nitrogen compounds. To assess a decrease in the growth of M. parvicella, Gram and Neisser staining and enumeration of the mentioned filaments were done using the methods developed by Pitt and Jenkins, and the results of the investigation showed a decrease in the number of the mentioned filaments. In addition, the volume indices of sludge and filamentous index were also investigated, which indicated the improvement of sludge settling quality. It was found that with changing the hydraulic flow distribution, the WWTP was capable of decreasing the concentration of ammonia and nitrate to less than 1 and 10 mg/L, respectively.

ajehe-10-120-g001
Fig. 1.

Different Modes of the Hydraulic Flow Distribution in Hamadan WWTP


Noutsopoulos et al also concluded that the plug flow configuration in biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems resulted in fulfilling control of M. parvicella. They reported that this configuration provides a selective advantage for floc-forming bacteria to remove RBCOD and therefore limits the growth of M. parvicella, which is mainly based on SBCOD and its hydrolysis products (16). In this full-scale study, the change in the configuration of the inlet flow from modes B and C (step-feeding) to mode D is actually a change in the flow pattern to the plug flow mode, which is accompanied by a decrease in the number of filamentous M. parvicella, an increase in filamentous Type 0041/0675, and an improvement in the quality of sludge sedimentation. Stephenson and Luker compared a full-scale application of plug-flow and step-feeding configurations and claimed that systems with step-feed flow distribution in nitrification showed more stability. Moreover, in a study conducted by Zhu et al, a high proportion of effluent was transferred to the first step, which showed a high total nitrogen removal efficiency. They explained that when the input ammonia concentration is higher, a relatively large part of the input flow must be transferred to the first stage in order to maintain the effluent ammonia concentration at a low level (2). Considering that the typical input ammonia levels at the studied WWTP consistently range from 30 to 50 mg/L and the requirement is to treat the wastewater to achieve an ammonia concentration below 1 mg/L, opting for mode D in Hamadan WWTP proved to be the most effective approach.

Considering the widespread use of the SFBNR process in wastewater treatment in Iran, it is recommended that operators of WWTPs, water and wastewater company managers, and industrial estate companies enhance the quality of treated wastewater by adjusting hydraulic flow distribution. By reallocating a significant portion of the inflow to the initial stages of the SFBNR system following mode D, notable improvements are observed in sludge settling quality and the reduction of filamentous Microthrix parvicella growth. These changes led to better effluent and sludge quality, including a reduction in ammonia levels to below 1 mg/L and enhanced system stability against organic loading shocks (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the reduction in foam formation resulted in improved effluent quality regarding turbidity and suspended particles. As depicted in Fig. 3, the SVI exhibited a distinct pattern during the years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, in which the system was operated in step-feeding mode. It consistently peaked during the cold seasons, typically averaging between 250 and 300 mL/g. This peak was attributed to the overgrowth of filamentous M. parvicella. However, following the alteration of flow distribution and the transition to mode D, the growth of this filamentous organism declined. This reduction in the population of filamentous M. parvicella was accompanied by a decline in SVI, which reached its lowest value, dipping below 140 mL/g in this state.

ajehe-10-120-g002
Fig. 2.

(a) Ammonia and (b) Nitrate (NO3 - N) Concentration in the Effluent of the Hamadan WWTP in Different Hydraulic Flow Distribution Modes


ajehe-10-120-g003
Fig. 3.

Pattern of SVI Changes Based on Input in Modes A, B, C, and D



Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the Deputy of Research and Technology of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences and Hamadan Province Water and Wastewater Company for providing research materials, equipment, and fund (project No. 14010220971).


Authors’ Contribution

Conceptualization: Ghasem Azarian.

Data curation: Majid Ghanbari Pak.

Formal analysis: Reza Shokoohi, Kazem Godini.

Funding acquisition: Ghasem Azarian.

Research: Majid Ghanbari Pak.

Methodology: Majid Ghanbari Pak, Ghasem Azarian.

Project administration: Ghasem Azarian.

Resources: Majid Ghanbari Pak.

Software: Ghasem Azarian.

Supervision: Ghasem Azarian, Kazem Godini.

Validation: Reza Shokoohi.

Visualization: Reza Shokoohi.

Writing–original draft: Ghasem Azarian, Majid Ghanbari Pak.

Writing–review & editing: Kazem Godini.


Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Funding

This study was funded by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.


References

  1. Turkan MR, Saeidijam S, Reyahi Khoram M. Upgrading of Tafresh municipal wastewater treatment plant (TMWTP) using the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process. J Adv Environ Health Res 2019; 7(4):241-8. doi: 10.22102/jaehr.2019.185631.1134 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. Zhu G, Peng Y, Wang S, Wu S, Ma B. Effect of influent flow rate distribution on the performance of step-feed biological nitrogen removal process. Chem Eng J 2007; 131(1):319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2006.12.023 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  3. Samadi MT, Shokoohi R, Poormohammadi AL, Azarian G, Harati M, Shanesaz S. Removal of bisphenol, using antimony nanoparticle multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite from aqueous solutions. Orient J Chem 2016; 32(2):1015-24. doi: 10.13005/ojc/320227 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  4. Sathya R, Arasu MV, Al-Dhabi NA, Vijayaraghavan P, Ilavenil S, Rejiniemon TS. Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by biological methods–a challenges and advantages of recent technologies. Urban Clim 2023; 47:101378. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101378 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  5. Liu T, Li Q, Quan X. Step-feed sequence batch reactor filled with surface-modified carriers can enhance nitrogen removal from low C/N ratio wastewater. Biochem Eng J 2023; 192:108848. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2023.108848 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  6. Fan N, Wang R, Qi R, Gao Y, Rossetti S, Tandoi V. Control strategy for filamentous sludge bulking: bench-scale test and full-scale application. Chemosphere 2018; 210:709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.028 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  7. Fan NS, Qi R, Huang BC, Jin RC, Yang M. Factors influencing Candidatus Microthrixparvicella growth and specific filamentous bulking control: a review. Chemosphere 2020; 244:125371. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125371 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Xie B, Dai XC, Xu YT. Cause and pre-alarm control of bulking and foaming by Microthrixparvicella--a case study in triple oxidation ditch at a wastewater treatment plant. J Hazard Mater 2007; 143(1-2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.006 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Mamais D, Andreadakis A, Noutsopoulos C, Kalergis C. Causes of, and control strategies for, Microthrixparvicella bulking and foaming in nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Water Sci Technol 1998; 37(4):9-17. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00078-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  10. Eikelboom DH, Andreadakis A, Andreasen K. Survey of filamentous populations in nutrient removal plants in four European countries. Water Sci Technol 1998; 37(4):281-9. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00120-6 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  11. Noutsopoulos C, Mamais D, Andreadakis A, Stams A. A hypothesis on Microthrixparvicella proliferation in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems with selector tanks. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2012; 80(2):380-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01304.x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  12. Rice EW, Bridgewater L. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2017.
  13. Kowalska E, Paturej E, Zielińska M. Use of Lecane rotifers for limiting Thiothrix filamentous bacteria in bulking activated sludge in a dairy wastewater treatment plant. Arch Biol Sci 2014; 66(4):1371-8. doi: 10.2298/abs1404371k [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  14. Collivignarelli MC, Baldi M, Abbà A, Caccamo FM, Carnevale Miino M, Rada EC. Foams in wastewater treatment plants: from causes to control methods. Appl Sci 2020; 10(8):2716. doi: 10.3390/app10082716 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  15. Pal P, Khairnar K, Paunikar WN. Causes and remedies for filamentous foaming in activated sludge treatment plant. Glob Nest J 2014; 16(4):762-72. [ Google Scholar]
  16. Noutsopoulos C, Mamais D, Andreadakis AD. The effect of reactor configuration and operational mode on Microthrixparvicella bulking and foaming in nutrient removal activated sludge systems. Water Sci Technol 2002; 46(1-2):61-4. [ Google Scholar]